On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:05:14PM +1000, Emily Grettel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've decided to replace my WD10EADS and WD10EARS drives as I've checked the > SMART values and they've accrued some insanely high numbers for the > load/unload counts (40K+ in 120 days on one!). > > > > I was leaning towards the Black drives but now I'm a bit worried about the > TLER lackingness which was a mistake made my previous sysadmin. > > > > I'm wondering what other people are using, even though the Green series has > let me down, I'm still a Western Digital gal.
Try WD RE3 and RE4 series, no issues here so far. Presumably, 1 TByte would be better than 2 TByte due to resilver times. Some say Hitachis work, too. > Would you recommend any of these for use in a ZFS NAS? > > > > > 4x WD2003FYYS - http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=732 [RE4] > 4x WD2002FYPS - http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=610 > [Green] > 6x WD1002FBYS - http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=503 [RE3] > > > What do people already use on their enterprise level NAS's? Any good Seagates? After a 7200.11 debacle (in fact, SMART just told me I've got another deader on my hands) I'm quite leery. Maybe the SAS Seagates are better. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
