On May 4, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote: > On 16/02/2010 21:54, Jeff Bonwick wrote: >>> People used fastfs for years in specific environments (hopefully >>> understanding the risks), and disabling the ZIL is safer than fastfs. >>> Seems like it would be a useful ZFS dataset parameter. >>> >> We agree. There's an open RFE for this: >> >> 6280630 zil synchronicity >> >> No promise on date, but it will bubble to the top eventually. >> >> > > So everyone knows - it has been integrated into snv_140 :)
Congratulations, Robert! _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
