On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 05:48 -0700, Tonmaus wrote: > Don't copy the netiquette issue you are seeing, as I am talking about nothing > but an issue in a post on this forum. Why should I contact the OP off record > about this? > There is no need to read intentions either. I just made clear once more what > is obvious from board metadata anyhow. > Besides that, if we are having a dispute about netiquette, that highlights > the potential substance of the topic more than anything else. > > Regards, > > Tonmaus
fwiw- the post was to a mailing list handled by the excellent, and these days defacto standard open source, listserver Mailman. Apparently backend processing then propagates to Jive forums after stripping URLs. Hence the missing link when viewed via the forums, opening the potential for confusion for the unaware. If you want to follow the link included in my OP, simply access via Mailman archives, where it is indeed reproduced intact. Thank you and have a nice day. P.S.; Speaking of netiquette, it is also quite nice that Mailman is smart enough to know to wrap email body text at 72-80 chars. I've never admined Jive forum and unsure whether it's tunable but it would be nice if the powers that be could configure Jive to wrap emails at correct line lengths. -- Ken Gunderson <kgund...@teamcool.net> _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
