ouch! My apologies! I did not understand what you were trying to say. I was gearing towards:
1. Using the newer 1TB in the eventual RAIDZ. Newer hardware typically means (slightly) faster access times and sequential throughput. 2. Getting the RAIDZ serviceable quick. Your method will cause two full copy operations. Data will likely be copied to the same extent with my method but it will become and remain available (almost) all the time (minus 1TB failing on me during the transition). -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
