On 16 mrt 2010, at 19:48, valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it could just be a coincidence. That is,
> perhaps the data that you copied happens to lead to a dedup ratio relative to
> the data that's already on there. You could test this out by copying a few
> gigabytes of data you know is unique (like maybe a DVD video file or
> something), and that should change the dedup ratio.
The first copy of that data was unique and even dedup is switched off for the
entire pool so it seems a bug in the calculation of the
dedupratio or it used a method that is giving unexpected results.
Paul
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
