Ross is correct - advanced OS features are not required here - just the ability to store a file - don’t even need unix style permissions....
-----Original Message----- From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ross Walker Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:23 AM To: ольга крыжановская Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] terrible ZFS performance compared to UFS on ramdisk (70% drop) On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:46 PM, ольга крыжановская <olga.kryzh anov...@gmail.com> wrote: > tmpfs lacks features like quota and NFSv4 ACL support. May not be the > best choice if such features are required. True, but if the OP is looking for those features they are more then unlikely looking for an in-memory file system. This would be more for something like temp databases in a RDBMS or a cache of some sort. -Ross _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
