Hi,

Just some comments on your situation , please take a look the following
things :

    * Sometimes the hw looks the same, i'm talking specifically to the
      SSD's, but they can be somehow different and that may lead to some
      problems in the future . Bottom line is , don't go too cheap for
      production :)
    * If you bought 3 7210 full of disks, they put pressure in your Sun
      reseller to get some very cheap (i would say for free!) logzillas
      . Their margin is more than okay to give you at least 1 logzilla
      to your primary box .
    * With ZFS always make sure you use a UPS attached to system  and
      make sure that you make a gracefull shutdown of the system in the
      event of power failure and drained batteries on the UPS. If
      possible use some sort of no-break system, like an auxiliary
      generator or so.
    * If possible don't use any box whatsoever in production before 2 to
      4 weeks of testing/pre-production . It's quite often to see
      problems when we stop to use benchmarks and start to use the
      systems in production. Benchmarks i often called them "controlled
      chaos", but based on my experiences in production there's only
      "chaos", without the "controlled" part ;) . We never now when some
      application that *should* do some sequencial reads is actually
      doing random reads...
    * Don't give up "easily"  on the Sun support guys . Again based on
      my experiences, quite often you need to put pressure in your Sun
      partner/reseller to get the necessary amount of attention to your
      problem..please remember that money is what drives business .
    * On your XEN, do you really LVM-over-iscsi? Can you live with NFS
      storage repositorys in the XEN? In my current job, i never
      achieved better performance with iscsi than what i have with NFS,
      and NFS gives less issues..just take a look to the all snapshot
      issues in Citrix Xen forums for people using ISCSI rather than NFS
      . Also in a near-by future (i hope) pNFS will be there so,
      therefore more and more performance for the NFS stack ;)
    * Still on the XEN, i found that in my current environment enabling
      jumbo frames in the xen physical servers leads to massive
      problems..so if you can take a look to the jumbo frames support
      for your specific network cards
    * Getting out from the OS installed in your 7210, towards anything
      else probably means that you will lose support from Sun..so i
      don't know if that's such a good idea. Again, put pressure in the
      Sun reseller to get attention to your problem and don't take
      shortcuts and don't get mad ;) I been there, i know the feeling of
      having to put something , expensive, to work and it just doesn't
      work as it should.
    * Keep this list informed, they are great minds around here, so
      maybe someone can give you some extra help


Good luck,
Bruno

On 23-2-2010 23:45, Nate Carlson wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've put up a blog post on issues we're having with 3 brand new Unified 
> Storage 7210 arrays, available here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yeo9pft
>
> I'm curious if the symptoms (spurious halt, spurious vlan ipmp group 
> dropping, spurious reboots) that we are seeing are common for the X4540 
> machine, or if you think it's likely to be a problem with the way Sun rolls 
> the Unified Storage software package.
>
> If it is a software issue, and we are unable to return these machines, I'm 
> considering running either OpenSolaris or NexentaStor on the hardware.. 
> hoping that it's a software issue and not hardware.  ;)  (Going OpenSol or 
> Nexenta would also let us add our own SSD's without worrying about Sun 
> complaining about it.. $400 for 32gb x25-e's sounds a lot better than $6k for 
> an 18gb Logzilla!)
>
> Appreciate any thoughts!
>   

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to