On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, matthew patton wrote:
Of the "we force you to buy our overinflated drives" camp, Dell is the cheapest but also the most inefficient by far on power/space. The HP puts 70 disks in 4U. NexSan 42, and Sun 48. The clear winner here is HP.
What is the performance like with HP? Is there a loss of bandwidth or reliability due to their approach?
Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
