Isn't the dedupe bug fixed in svn133? -marc
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jeffry Molanus <jeffry.mola...@proact.nl>wrote: > There is no clustering package for it and available source seems very old > also the de-dup bug is there iirc. So if you don't need HA cluster and > dedup.. > > BR, Jeffry > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Sousa > > Sent: dinsdag 23 februari 2010 8:37 > > To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > Subject: [zfs-discuss] Opensolaris 2010.03 / snv releases > > > > Hi all, > > > > According to what i have been reading the opensolaris 2010.03 should be > > released around March this year, but with all the process of the > Oracle/Sun > > deal i was wondering if anyone knows if this schedule still makes sense, > > and if not does snv_132/133 look very similar to future 2010.03. > > In other words, without waiting for the opensolaris 2010.03 would anyone > > risk to put in production any box with snv_132/133 ? > > > > Thanks, > > Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
