> An UPS plus disabling zil, or disabling synchronization, could possibly
> achieve the same result (or maybe better) iops wise.
Even with the fastest slog, disabling zil will always be faster...
(less bytes to move)
> This would probably work given that your computer never crashes
> in an uncontrolled manner. If it does, some data may be lost
> (and possibly the entire pool lost, if you are unlucky).
the pool would never be at risk, but when your server
reboots, its clients will be confused that things
it sent, and the server promised it had saved, are gone.
For some clients, this small loss might be the loss of their
entire dataset.
Rob
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
