So, one of the tricks I've used in the past is to assign a volname in format as 
I use luns.  Dunno if that's an option with ASM?  ZFS seems to blow those away, 
the last time I looked.

-A

On Feb 13, 2010, at 14:32 , Jason King wrote:

> My problem is when you have 100+ luns divided between OS and DB,
> keeping track of what's for what can become problematic.   It becomes
> even worse when you start adding luns -- the chance of accidentally
> grabbing a DB lun instead of one of the new ones is non-trivial (then
> there's also the chance that your storage guy might make a mistake and
> give you luns already mapped elsewhere on accident -- which I have
> seen happen before).  And when you're forced to do it at 3am after
> already working 12 hours that day.... well safeguards are a good
> thing.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Allen Eastwood <mi...@paconet.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> There is of course the caveat of using raw devices with databases (it
>>> becomes harder to track usage, especially as the number of LUNs
>>> increases, slightly less visibility into their usage statistics at the
>>> OS level ).   However perhaps now someone can implement the CR I filed
>>> a long time ago to add ASM support to libfstyp.so that would allow
>>> zfs, mkfs, format, etc. to identify ASM volumes =)
>> 
>> While that would be nice, I would submit that if using ASM, usage becomes 
>> solely a DBA problem.  From the OS level, as a system admin, I don't really 
>> care…I refer any questions back to the DBA.  They should have tools to deal 
>> with all that.
>> 
>> OTOH, with more things stacked on more servers (zones, etc.) I might care if 
>> there's a chance of whatever Oracle is doing affecting performance elsewhere.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>> 

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to