I have a similar situation. I have a system that is used for backup copies of 
logs and other non-critical things, where the primary copy is on a Netapp. Data 
gets written in batches a few times a day. We use this system because storage 
on it is a lot less expensive than on the Netapp. It's only non-critical data 
that is sent via NFS. Critical data is sent to this server either by zfs send | 
receive, or by an rsync running on the server that reads from the Netapp over 
NFS. Thus the important data shouldn't go through the ZIL.

I am seriously considering turning off the ZIL, because NFS write performance 
is so lousy.

I'd use SSD, except that I can't find a reasonable way of doing so. I have a 
pair of servers with Sun Cluster, sharing a J4200 JBOD. If there's a failure, 
operations move to the other server. Thus a local SSD is no better than ZIL 
disabled. I'd love to put an SSD in the J4200, but the claim that this was 
going to be supported seems to have vanished.

Someone once asked why I both with redundant systems if I don't care about the 
data. The answer is that if the NFS mounts hang, my production service hang. 
Also, I do care about some of the data. It just happens not to go through the 
ZIL.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to