> Hi-- > > Were you trying to swap out a drive in your pool's > raidz1 VDEV > with a spare device? Was that your original > intention?
Not really. I just wanted to see what happens if the physical controller port changes, i.e. what practical relevance it would have if I put the disks in the same order after moving them from enclosure to enclosure. It was a simulation of that principle by just swapping 3/10 drives from position ABC to CAB. The naive assumption was that the pool would just import normally. I have checked: All resources are available as before. %t0%- %t11% are attached to the system. The odd thing still is: %t9% was a member of the pool - where is it? And: I thought a spare could only be 'online' in any pool or 'available', not both at the same time. Does it make more sense now? Regards, Tonmaus -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
