>>>>> "ca" == Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulb...@aei.mpg.de> writes:
>>>>> "ls" == Lutz Schumann <presa...@storageconcepts.de> writes:

    ca> X25-E drives and a converter from 3.5 to 2.5 inches. So far
    ca> two systems have shown pretty bad instabilities with that.

instability after crashing or instability while running?  Lutz
Schumann 2010-01-10 seemed to find the x25m g2 was ignoring sync cache
commands when its write cache was set to ``on'', but it did indeed do
uncached writing if you turn the write cache off for the whole drive
albeit at half the performance advertised in the spec sheet:

    ls> Intel X25-M G2: - If I pull the power cable much data is lost,
    ls> altought commited to the app (some hundred) - If I pull the
    ls> sata cable no data is lost
  
    ls> ST3500418AS: - If I pull the power cable almost no data is
    ls> lost, but still the last write is lost (strange!)  - If I pull
    ls> the sata cable no data is lost

the test for it was to write a program that did 'write, sync, write,
sync' and notice when yaning x25m power connector with cache on <n>
transactions were lost, while yanking SATA connector 0 or 1
transactions were lost.  Therefore I suspect the x25e which also lacks
a supercap might also be another deliberately broken to inflate specs
drive, and if it's instability after crashing you might try to disable
the x25e write cache (1/2 performance) and try again?

Attachment: pgpM3Wk0Y64mC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to