Hello,

Anyone else noticed that zpool is kind of negative when reporting back from 
some error conditions?

Like:
cannot import 'zpool01': I/O error
        Destroy and re-create the pool from
        a backup source.

or even worse:

cannot import 'rpool': pool already exists
        Destroy and re-create the pool from
        a backup source.

The first one i got when doing some failure testing on my new storage node, 
i've pulled several disks from a raidz2 to simulate loss off connectivity, 
lastly I pulled a third one which as expected made the pool unusable and later 
exported the pool. But when I reconnected one of the previous two drives and 
tried a import I got this message, the pool was fine once I reconnected the 
last disk to "fail", so the messages seems a bit pessimistic.

The second one i got when importing a old rpool with altroot but forgot to 
specify a new name for the pool, the solution to just add a new name to the 
pool was much better than recreating the pool and restoring from backup.

I think this could scare or even make new users do terrible things, even if the 
errors could be fixed. I think I'll file a bug, agree?

Henrik
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to