On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:33:23PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Thomas Burgess <wonsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm PRETTY sure the kingston drives i ordered are as good/better
> >
> > i just didnt' know that they weren't "good enough"
> 
> I disagree that those drives are "good enough".  That particular drive
> uses the dreaded JMicron controller - which has a really bad
> reputation.  And a poor reputation that it *earned* and deserves.
> Even though these drives use a newer revision of the original JMicron
> part (that basically sucks) - this one is *not* much better.  Have a


meandering off topic here ...

i use one of those 64G kingston jmicron/toshiba drives in my mac.

The "stuttering" problems attributed to the older jmicron drives are
non-existent with this one in my experience.

I have not done anything to optimize for slow writes (eg, disable browser
disk cache).

The overall performance improvement on my system is huge, due to the
very-fast reads.  

Mine is old enough and full enough that all cells have been written to
at this point.

Overall I am very pleased with the drive, especially for the price
paid.

I agree with Al that it probably isn't suitable as a ZIL.  Maybe as a
read cache though.

danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224

Winter 2010 ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs
Hosted by the University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
January 31 - February 4, 2010
http://events.internet2.edu/2010/jt-slc/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to