Ragnar Sundblad <ra...@csc.kth.se> wrote:

> On 1 jan 2010, at 17.28, David Magda wrote:

> > Don't really see how things are either hardware specific or dependent.
>
> The inner workings of a SSD flash drive is pretty hardware (or
> rather vendor) specific, and it may not be a good idea to move
> any knowledge about that to the file system layer.

If ZFS likes to keep SSDs fast even after it was in use for a while, then
even ZFS would need to tell the SSD which sectors are no longer in use.


Such a mode may cause a noticable performance loss as ZFS for this reason
may need to traverse freed outdated data trees but it will help the SSD
to erase the needed space in advance.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       j...@cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to