On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Eric D. Mudama <edmud...@bounceswoosh.org>wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29 at 12:40, Tim Cook wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Duane Walker <du...@walker-family.org >> >wrote: >> >> I tried running an OpenSolaris server so I could use ZFS but SMB Serving >>> wasn't reliable (it would only work for about 15 minutes). >>> >> >> >> I've been running native cifs on Opensolaris for 3 years with about 15 >> minutes of downtime total which was for upgrades. Solaris was not your >> problem. >> > > If he tried using 2009.06 (the latest stable release) your statement > is false. > > 2009.06 is unusable for serious CIFS work due to the hangs fixed in > b114/b116, and being at the bleeding edge of the dev repository often > has risks if you're not familiar administering a Solaris/OpenSolaris > system. > > > "Serious CIFS work" meaning what? I've got a system that's been running 2009.06 for 6 months in a small office setting and it hasn't been "unusable" for anything I've needed. -- --Tim
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
