On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Saso Kiselkov <skisel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm still trying to find the case number I have open with Sunsolve or >> whatever, it was for exactly this issue, and I believe the fix was to >> add dozens more "classes" to the scheduler, to allow more fair disk >> I/O and overall "niceness" on the system when ZFS commits a >> transaction group. > > Wow, if there were a production-release solution to the problem, that > would be great!
Have you checked this thread? http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg28704.html > Reading the mailing list I almost gave up hope that I'd > be able to work around this issue without upgrading to the latest > bleeding-edge development version. Isn't opensolaris already bleeding edge? -- Fajar _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
