And how do you expect the mirrored iSCSI volume to work after failover, with secondary (ex-primary) unreachable?
Regards, Andrey On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Erik Trimble <erik.trim...@sun.com> wrote: > Charles Hedrick wrote: >> >> Is ISCSI reliable enough for this? >> > > YES. > > The original idea is a good one, and one that I'd not thought of. The (old) > iSCSI implementation is quite mature, if not anywhere as nice > (feature/flexibility-wise) as the new COMSTAR stuff. > > I'm thinking that just putting in a straight-through cable between the two > machine is the best idea here, rather than going through a switch. > > -- > Erik Trimble > Java System Support > Mailstop: usca22-123 > Phone: x17195 > Santa Clara, CA > Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800) > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
