Andrey Kuzmin <andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com> writes: > Downside you have described happens only when the same checksum is > used for data protection and duplicate detection. This implies sha256, > BTW, since fletcher-based dedupe has been dropped in recent builds.
if the hash used for dedup is completely separate from the hash used for data protection, I don't see any downsides to computing the dedup hash from uncompressed data. why isn't it? -- Kjetil T. Homme Redpill Linpro AS - Changing the game _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
