On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Jens Elkner
<jel+...@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:23:21PM +0000, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
>> As to whether it makes sense (as opposed to two distinct physical
>> devices), you would have read cache hits competing with log writes for
>> bandwidth. I doubt both will be pleased :-)
>
> Hmm - good point. What I'm trying to accomplish:
>
> Actually our current prototype thumper setup is:
>        root pool (1x 2-way mirror SATA)
>        hotspare  (2x SATA shared)
>        pool1 (12x 2-way mirror SATA)   ~25% used       user homes
>        pool2 (10x 2-way mirror SATA)   ~25% used       mm files, archives, 
> ISOs
>
> So pool2 is not really a problem - delivers about 600MB/s uncached,
> about 1.8 GB/s cached (i.e. read a 2nd time, tested with a 3.8GB iso)
> and is not contineously stressed. However sync write is ~ 200 MB/s
> or 20 MB/s and mirror, only.
>
> Problem is pool1 - user homes! So GNOME/firefox/eclipse/subversion/soffice
> usually via NFS and a litle bit via samba -> a lot of more or less small
> files, probably widely spread over the platters. E.g. checkin' out a
> project from a svn|* repository into a home takes "hours". Also having
> its workspace on NFS isn't fun (compared to linux xfs driven local soft
> 2-way mirror).

Flash-based read cache should help here by minimizing (metadata) read
latency, and flash-based log would bring down write latency. The only
drawback of using single F20 is that you're trying to minimize both
with the same device.

>
> So, seems to be a really interesting thing and I expect at least wrt.
> user homes a real improvement, no matter, how the final configuration
> will look like.
>
> Maybe the experts at the source are able to do some 4x SSD vs. 1xF20
> benchmarks? I guess at least if they turn out to be good enough, it
> wouldn't hurt ;-)

Would be interesting indeed.

Regards,
Andrey

>
>> > Jens Elkner wrote:
> ...
>> >> whether it is possible/supported/would make sense to use a Sun Flash
>> >> Accelerator F20 PCIe Card in a X4540 instead of 2.5" SSDs?
>
> Regards,
> jel.
> --
> Otto-von-Guericke University     http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/
> Department of Computer Science   Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2
> 39106 Magdeburg, Germany         Tel: +49 391 67 12768
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to