On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Brent Jones wrote: > >> I've noticed some extreme performance penalties simply by using snv_128 > > Does the 'zpool scrub' rate seem similar to before? Do you notice any read > performance problems? What happens if you send to /dev/null rather than via > ssh? > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ >
Scrubs on both systems seem to take about the same amoutn of time (16 hours, on a 48TB pool, with about 20TB used) I'll test to dev/null tonight -- Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
