* Neil Perrin (neil.per...@sun.com) wrote: > > > On 12/09/09 13:52, Glenn Lagasse wrote: > >* R.G. Keen (k...@geofex.com) wrote: > >>I didn't see "remove a simple device" anywhere in there. > >> > >>Is it: > >>too hard to even contemplate doing, or > >>too silly a thing to do to even consider letting that happen > >>or too stupid a question to even consider > >>or > >>too easy and straightforward to do the procedure I see recommended (export > >>the whole pool, destroy the pool, remove the device, remake the pool, then > >>reimport the pool) to even bother with? > > > >You missed: > > > >Too hard to do correctly with current resource levels and other higher > >priority work. > > > >As always, volunteers I'm sure are welcome. :-) > > > > This gives the impression that development is not actively working > on it. This is not true. As has been said often it is a difficult problem
True. I apologize for the misleading nature of my comment. I should have pointed out that I don't work on the ZFS project but was relating what I believed the possible answer could be based upon past list postings of the subject. > and has been actively worked on for a few months now. I don't think > we are prepared to give a date as to when it will be delivered though. Cool! -- Glenn _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
