> > On 11/23/09 10:10 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Lots of storage servers, outside the big corporate 
>environment, can't
> afford full-blown redundancy.  For many of us, we're
> just taking the first
> steps into using any kind of redundancy at all in
> disks for our file
> servers.  Full enterprise-grade storage is too
> expensive for many of us,
> and we're looking for close to that level risk of
> loss, but are willing to
> sacrifice some on the availability (it's okay for the
> server to be down
> while I replace the power supply; after all, I can't
> be sitting at my
> computer anyway, I have to replace this power
> supply).
What you said! And have a beer!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to