On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Emily Grettel <emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Well I took the plunge updating to the latest dev version. (snv_127) and I > don't seem to be able to remotely login via ssh via putty: > > Using username "emilytg". > Authenticating with public key "dsa-pub" from agent > Server refused to allocate pty > Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 November 2008
This looks like... http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12380 But that was supposed to be fixed in snv_126. Can you check /etc/minor_perm for this entry: clone:ptmx 0666 root sys Mike > > Not good :( > > Cheers, > Em > > ________________________________ > From: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com > To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:30:45 +1100 > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost > >> by a Win7 client was crashing our CIFS server within 5-10 seconds. > Hmmm thats probably it then. Most of our users have been using Windows 7 and > people put their machines on standby when they leave the office for the day. > Maybe this is why we've had issues and having to restart on a daily basis. > It works fine during the day with no downtime. > > Is it safe to update to the latest dev version? I know it creates a BE and > we can revert to 2009.06 later but is there a way of just updating ZFS > instead of downloading 800Mb more and updating the entire OS? > > Cheers, > Em > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:14:06 -0700 >> From: edmud...@bounceswoosh.org >> To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com >> CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost >> >> On Sat, Nov 21 at 11:41, Emily Grettel wrote: >> > >> > Wow that was mighty quick Tim! >> > >> > Sorry, I have to reboot the server. I can SSH into the box, VNC etc >> > but no CIFS shares are visible. >> >> I found 2009.06 to be unusable for CIFS due to hangs that weren't >> resolved until b114/b116. We had to revert to 2008.11, as any access >> by a Win7 client was crashing our CIFS server within 5-10 seconds. >> >> These were the suspected culprits: >> >> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2009-June/015711.html >> >> though I think there was another issue in b114 that wasn't resolved >> until b116. >> >> Unfortunately, the zpool default version in 2009.06 is 1 iteration >> ahead of the one in 2008.11, so there's no smooth downgrade if you >> created your zpools with a 2009.06 image. We had started with 2008.11 >> and not updated our zpool, so a re-install of 2008.11 worked. >> >> The latest dev branch (b126-or-thereabouts, 2010.02 preview) is >> reportedly good for CIFS based on traffic from this list. >> >> --eric >> >> -- >> Eric D. Mudama >> edmud...@mail.bounceswoosh.org >> > > ________________________________ > Check out The Great Australian Pay Check now Want to know what your boss is > paid? > ________________________________ > View photos of singles in your area! Looking for a date? > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
