"David Dyer-Bennet" <d...@dd-b.net> wrote: > The problem with this, I think, is that to be used by any significant > number of users, the module has to be included in a distribution, not just > distributed by itself. (And the different distributions have their own > policies on what they will and won't consider including in terms of > licenses.)
For this argument, I recommend to read the OpenSource Definition at: http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php in special look at section 9. The FSF grants you that the GPL is an OSS compliant license, so there is no difference between shipping ZFS separately and shipping it as part of a distro. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
