There is a debate tactic known as complex argument, where so many false and misleading statements are made at once, that it overwhelms the respondent.
I'm just going to respond this way. I am very disappointed in this discussion group. The response is not genuine. The idea that latency is not important, patently absurd. I am not going into the details of my private application, so you can pick at it. If you want to say latency has no relevance, you can defend that absurdity at the risk of your own reputation. The responses are not, in my opinion, genuine. Attacking Intel's spec sheet, when simultanously defending no latency #'s being release by another vendor? well I sent 3 emails in response earlier this morning, but I wasn't logged in, so I don't know if the mod will post them or not. Moderator, you don't have to, this will suffice as my last email. Guys, I don't have time to waste with you, and I feel that it is very wasteful to sit here and argue with people who either a) don't understand technology or more likely b) simply are being argumentative because they have a vested interest. Either way, I don't see genuine help. I am going to remove my account, and good bye! best of luck to everyone. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
