The user/group used can be out of date by a few seconds, same as the "used" and "referenced" properties. You can run sync(1M) to wait for these values to be updated. However, that doesn't seem to be the problem you are encountering here.

Can you send me the output of:

zfs list zpool1/sd01_mail
zfs get all zpool1/sd01_mail
zfs userspace -t all zpool1/sd01_mail
ls -ls /export/sd01/mail
zdb -vvv zpool1/sd01_mail

--matt

Jorgen Lundman wrote:

Are there way to force ZFS to update, or refresh it in some way when the user quota/used value is not true to what is the case? Are there known way to make it out of sync that we should avoid?

SunOS x4500-11.unix 5.10 Generic_141445-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
(Solaris 10 10/09 u8)


zpool1/sd01_mail               223M  15.6T   222M  /export/sd01/mail


# zfs userspace zpool1/sd01_mail
TYPE        NAME    USED  QUOTA
POSIX User  1029   54.0M   100M

# df -h .
Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
zpool1/sd01_mail        16T   222M    16T     1%    /export/sd01/mail


# ls -lhn
total 19600
-rw------- 1 1029 2100 1.7K Oct 20 12:03 1256007793.V4700025I1770M252506.vmx06.unix:2,S -rw------- 1 1029 2100 1.7K Oct 20 12:04 1256007873.V4700025I1772M63715.vmx06.unix:2,S -rw------- 1 1029 2100 1.6K Oct 20 12:05 1256007926.V4700025I1773M949133.vmx06.unix:2,S -rw------- 1 1029 2100 76M Oct 20 12:23 1256009005.V4700025I1791M762643.vmx06.unix:2,S -rw------- 1 1029 2100 54M Oct 20 12:36 1256009769.V4700034I179eM739748.vmx05.unix:2,S
-rw------T   1 1029     2100        2.0M Oct 20 14:39 file

The 54M file appears to to accounted for, but the 76M is not. I recently added a 2M by chown to see if it was a local-disk, vs NFS problem. The previous had not updated for 2 hours.


# zfs get useru...@1029 zpool1/sd01_mail
NAME              PROPERTY       VALUE          SOURCE
zpool1/sd01_mail  useru...@1029  54.0M          local


Any suggestions would be most welcome,

Lund



_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to