>If you don't give ZFS any redundancy, you risk loosing you pool if there is >data corruption.
Is this the same risk for data corruption as UFS on hardware based luns? If we present one LUN to ZFS and choose not to ZFS mirror or do a raidz pool of that LUN is ZFS able to handle disk or raid controllers failures on the hardware array? Does ZFS handle intermittent controller outages on the raid controllers the same as what UFS would? Thanks, Shawn -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
