On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:59:16PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > > However, I went to create a new boot environment to install the patches > > into, and so far that's been running for about an hour and a half :(, > > which was not expected or planned for. > [...] > > I don't think I'm going to make my downtime window :(, and will probably > > need to reschedule the patching. I never considered I might have to start > > the patch process six hours before the window. > > Well, so far lucreate took 3.5 hours, lumount took 1.5 hours, applying the > patches took all of 10 minutes, luumount took about 20 minutes, and > luactivate has been running for about 45 minutes. I'm assuming it will
Have a look at http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~elkner/luc/lu-5.10.patch or http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~elkner/luc/lu-5.11.patch ... So first install most recent LU patches and than one of the above. Since still on vacation (for ~8 weeks), haven't checked, whether there are new LU patches out there and the patches still match (usually they do). If not, adjusting the files manually shouldn't be a problem ;-) There are also versions for pre svn_b107 and pre 121430-36,121431-37: see http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~elkner/ More info: http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~elkner/luc/lutrouble.html#luslow Have fun, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 67 12768 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
