On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mike Gerdts<mger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Damjan
> Perenic<damjan.pere...@guest.arnes.si> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Richard
>> Elling<richard.ell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:39 AM, Ed Spencer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suspect that if we 'rsync' one of these filesystems to a second
>>>> server/pool  that we would also see a performance increase equal to what
>>>> we see on the development server. (I don't know how zfs send a receive
>>>> work so I don't know if it would address this "Filesystem Entropy" or
>>>> specifically reorganize the files and directories). However, when we
>>>> created a testfs filesystem in the zfs pool on the production server,
>>>> and copied data to it, we saw the same performance as the other
>>>> filesystems, in the same pool.
>>>
>>> Directory walkers, like NetBackup or rsync, will not scale well as
>>> the number of files increases.  It doesn't matter what file system you
>>> use, the scalability will look more-or-less similar. For millions of files,
>>> ZFS send/receive works much better.  More details are in my paper.
>>
>> It would be nice if ZFS had something similar to VxFS File Change Log.
>> This feature is very useful for incremental backups and other
>> directory walkers, providing they support FCL.
>
> I think this tangent deserves its own thread.  :)
>
> To save a trip to google...
>
> http://sfdoccentral.symantec.com/sf/5.0MP3/linux/manpages/vxfs/man1m/fcladm.html
>
> This functionality would come in very handy.  It would seem that it
> isn't too big of a deal to identify the files that changed, as this
> type of data is already presented via "zpool status -v" when
> corruption is detected.
>
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gbctx?a=view

In fact ZFS has a good transaction log, maybe the issue is there isn't
software out there yet that uses it.

-Ross
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to