> IIRC zpool list includes the parity drives in the disk space calculation and zfs list doesn't.
> Terabyte drives are more likely 900-something GB drives thanks to that base-2 vs. base-10 confusion HD manufacturers introduced. Using that 900GB figure I get to both 40TB and 32TB for with and without parity drives. Spares aren't counted. I see format/verify shows the disk size as 931GB Volume name = < > ascii name = <ATA-HITACHI HUA7210S-A90A-931.51GB> bytes/sector = 512 sectors = 1953525166 accessible sectors = 1953525133 Part Tag Flag First Sector Size Last Sector 0 usr wm 256 931.51GB 1953508749 1 unassigned wm 0 0 0 2 unassigned wm 0 0 0 3 unassigned wm 0 0 0 4 unassigned wm 0 0 0 5 unassigned wm 0 0 0 6 unassigned wm 0 0 0 8 reserved wm 1953508750 8.00MB 1953525133 I totally over looked the count the spares/don't count the spares issue. When they (the manufacturers) round up and then multiply by 48 the difference between what the sales brochure shows and what you end up with becomes significant. There was a time when manufacturers know about base-2 but those days are long gone. Thanks for the reply, Glen -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
