In the context of a low-volume file server, for a few users, is the
low-end Intel SSD sufficient?
A.
--
Adam Sherman
+1.613.797.6819
On 2009-07-23, at 14:09, Greg Mason <gma...@msu.edu> wrote:
I think it is a great idea, assuming the SSD has good write
performance.
This one claims up to 230MB/s read and 180MB/s write and it's only
$196.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820609393
Compared to this one (250MB/s read and 170MB/s write) which is $699.
Oops. Forgot the link:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167014
Are those claims really trustworthy? They sound too good to be true!
-Kyle
Kyle-
The less expensive SSD is an MLC device. The Intel SSD is an SLC
device.
That right there accounts for the cost difference. The SLC device
(Intel
X25-E) will last quite a bit longer than the MLC device.
-Greg
--
Greg Mason
System Administrator
Michigan State University
High Performance Computing Center
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
