>>>>> "bj" == Brent Jones <br...@servuhome.net> writes:

    bj> many levels of fail here,

pft.  Virtualbox isn't unstable in any of my experience.  It doesn't
by default pass cache flushes from guest to host unless you set

VBoxManage setextradata VMNAME 
"VBoxInternal/Devices/piix3ide/0/LUN#[x]/Config/IgnoreFlush" 0

however OP does not mention the _host_ crashing, so this questionable
``optimization'' should not matter.  Yanking the guest's virtual cord
is something ZFS is supposed to tolerate:  remember the
``crash-consistent backup'' concept (not to mention the ``always
consistent on disk'' claim, but really any filesystem even without
that claim should tolerate having the guest's virtual cord yanked, or
the guest's kernel crashing, without losing all its contents---the
claim only means no time-consuming fsck after reboot).

    bj> to blame ZFS seems misplaced,

-1

The fact that it's a known problem doesn't make it not a problem.

    bj> the subject on this thread especially inflammatory.

so what?

Attachment: pgpsa1Xq1kR3M.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to