i might be wrong because i'm kind of new but i THINK you need to disable
automatic snapshots when resilvering, at least on the older version you did.

if not it would restart every time a new snapshot was made....but then
again, i may be wrong.


On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Galen <gal...@zinkconsulting.com> wrote:

> I know this topic has been discussed many times... but what the hell makes
> zpool resilvering so slow? I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06.
>
> I have had a large number of problematic disks due to a bad production
> batch, leading me to resilver quite a few times, progressively replacing
> each disk as it dies (and now preemptively removing disks.) My complaint is
> that resilvering ends up taking... days! The average write rate to the disk
> being resilvered is 1 to 3 MB/sec.
>
> You can see zpool status and iostat -v output here:
> http://pastebin.com/mcbb8dfd
>
> When I read files off the zpool, I get quite a few MB/sec even in a
> degraded state, although the zpool is idle while resilvering in this case -
> no snapshots or anything happening on it. The system has 3 GB of RAM and a
> 2.8 GHz dual core CPU which is always >90% idle while resilvering. The
> number of I/O operations per second is nowhere near the disk's limits.
> Scrubbing takes 3-4 hours at the most, so it's clearly not a read
> bottleneck. Even if I have a configuration where only one disk is being
> replaced (and all others are OK), I never pass the 1-3 MB/sec limit.
>
> What is going on? I have had to resilver 4 times so far, and I have to
> resilver at least once more. Each resilvering takes a day or two, and I cant
> see why... it's not CPU, it's not sustained read throughput, it's not IOPS,
> so what is it??
>
> Galen
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to