Phil Harman <phil.har...@sun.com> writes: > Gary Mills wrote: > The Solaris implementation of mmap(2) is functionally correct, but the > wait for a 64 bit address space rather moved the attention of > performance tuning elsewhere. I must admit I was surprised to see so > much code out there that still uses mmap(2) for general I/O (rather > than just to support dynamic linking).
Probably this is encouraged by documentation like this: > The memory mapping interface is described in Memory Management > Interfaces. Mapping files is the most efficient form of file I/O for > most applications run under the SunOS platform. Found at: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-4415/fileio-2?l=en&a=view Boyd. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
