On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Anderson <ander...@ligo.caltech.edu>wrote:
> > However, it is a bit disconcerting to have to run with reduced data > protection for an entire week. While I am certainly not going back to > UFS, it seems like it should be at least theoretically possible to do this > several orders of magnitude faster, e.g., what if every block on the > replacement disk had its RAIDZ2 data recomputed from the degraded Maybe this is also saying - that for large disk sets a single RAIDZ2 provides a false sense of security. Nicholas
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
