> I believe slice 9 (alternates) is an older method for > providing > alternate disk blocks on x86 systems. Apparently, it > can be removed by > using the format -e command. I haven't tried this > though.
format -e worked!! It is resilvering as I type this message. Thanks!! > I don't think removing slice 9 will help though if > these two disks > are not identical, hence the bug. They are identical though. The only difference is s0 on the second disk is slightly smaller than s0 on the first disk due to s9 stealing about 15MBs of space. So when I invoked "zpool attach -f rpool c7d0s0 c7d1s0", I get the "too small" error. After deleting s9, everything worked okay. Thanks Cindy!! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
