On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Tim wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Richard Elling >> <richard.ell...@gmail.com<mailto: >> richard.ell...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I see no evidence of an I/O or file system bottleneck here. While the >> service times are a little higher than I expect, I don't get >> worried until >> the %busy is high and actv is high and asvc_t is high(er). I >> think your >> problem is elsewhere. >> >> NB when looking at ZFS, a 1 second interval for iostat is too small >> to be useful. 10 seconds is generally better, especially for older >> releases of ZFS (anything on Solaris 10). >> >> <shameless plug> >> ZFS consulting available at http://www.richardelling.com >> </shamelss plug> >> >> -- richard >> >> So does that mean you don't work for Sun anymore...? >> > > I describe it as "free of the shackles of the corporate jail, I can > now recognize and act upon any opportunity I find interesting." > With Sun being bought by Oracle, I have a feeling there will > be plenty of opportunity... > -- richard > LOL, fair enough :) Sorry for the "intrusion" if you will. I just noticed the @gmail instead of the @sun (perhaps I'm a bit slow) and was a bit taken aback to see someone so involved in zfs was no longer with Sun. I guess whatever it takes to make the books look good. Oracle: It should be an interesting ride to say the least. I guess we'll see just how much they love linux... either zfs et. all will become GPL, or we'll see their true colors. I'm secretly hoping for the latter (as long as they keep it open sourced). --Tim
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
