>I'd like to submit an RFE suggesting that data + checksum be copied for >mirrored writes, but I won't waste anyone's time doing so unless you >think there is a point. One might argue that a machine this flaky should >be retired, but it is actually working quite well, and perhaps represents >not even the extreme of bad hardware that ZFS might encounter.
I think it's a stupid idea. If you get two checksums, what can you do? The second copy is most likely suspect and you double your chance that you use bad memory. Casper _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
