Hello Uwe,

Friday, April 17, 2009, 12:39:13 AM, you wrote:

UD> Drew Balfour wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone know why it's "applications" and not "data"?
>>
>> Perhaps something like:
>>
>> status: One or more devices has experienced an error. A successful 
>> attempt to
>>         correct the error was made using a replicated copy of the data.
>>         Data on the pool is unaffected.
>>

UD> If it was (successful), that would have been something. It wasn't. 
UD> 'status' brought up the 'unrecoverable error', whatever number of 
UD> 'scrub's I did. Toby: 'self-healing' is fine, but that message simply 
UD> sounds scary, and worse: it doesn't propose any further sort of action
UD> and its consequences.

And it was *something* as it did.
When you read the message carefully you will see that it says that
"Applications are unaffected" and you don't have to do anything. You
can investigate if you want to but you don't have to.

Now zpool scrub will read all used data and verify it against checksum,
correct if required and report new stats on error if needed. It won't
clear error statistics. If you want to clear them then use 'zpool
clear' as you did.


-- 
Best regards,
 Robert Milkowski
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to