You are seeing snapshots from Time-Slider's automatic snapshot service. If you have a copy of each of these 58 files elsewhere, I suppose you could re-copy them to the mirror and then do 'zpool clear [poolname]' to reset the error counter.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote: > I'm in well over my head with this report from zpool status saying: > > root # zpool status z3 > pool: z3 > state: DEGRADED > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data > corruption. Applications may be affected. > action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the > entire pool from backup. > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A > scrub: resilver completed after 0h7m with 38 errors on Sun Mar 29 18:37:28 > 2009 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > z3 DEGRADED 0 0 40 > mirror DEGRADED 0 0 80 > c5d0 DEGRADED 0 0 80 too many errors > c6d0 DEGRADED 0 0 80 too many errors > > This is that last thing and apparently the result of a series of steps > I've taken to increase a zpool mirrors size. > > There was quite a lot of huffing and puffing with the sata controller > that holds this mirror but the short version is: > > zpool z3 created as mirror on 2 older 200gb SATAI disks. On an > adaptec 1205sa PCI controller. > > After deciding I wanted increase the size of this pool, I detached 1 > disk, then pulled it out. I replaced it with a newer bigger sata II > wd750 gb disk. When I attempted to startup and attach this disk, I > didn't get by the boot process, and discovered my sata controller > could not handle the newer SATAII disk.. No boot was possible. > > I finally got the sata contoller in shape to work by flashing the 2 > part BIOS with latest bios for that card. (Sil 3112a chip). > > Restarted with 1 original 200gb disk and 1 new 750gb disk. > It booted and I was abble to attach the new larger drive and begin the > resilvering process. > > I went on to other things, but when I checked back I found the error > report cited above. > > I stared looking through the data but didn't really see much wrong. I > check the byte size with `du -sb' on the zpool and the source of the > data on a remote linux host. They were not the same but quite close. > I didn't think that meant much since it was on different filesystems. > zfs and reiserfs. > > I went to the web page cited in the report to see what I could learn. > To summarize it said this was serious business. That data might not > even be able to be removed but that for sure it needed to be replaced > from clean backup. > > Using zpool status -v z3 I learned there were 51 files said to be > corrupt. But when I looked at the files they were not part of the > original data. > > The original data was put there by an rsync process from a remote > host. and contained none of the named files. There files are of the > form (wrapped for mail): > > z3/www/rea...@zfs-auto-snap:frequent-2009-03-29-18:55:\ > /www/localhost/htdocs/lcweb/TrainingVids/VegasTraining/\ > VegasTraiiningTransitions.avi > > (All on one line) > > I'm not at all clear on what this is. The part after the colon is > what was rsynced over. The files that turned up in the report are all > *.mov *.avi, *.mpg or *.pdf. > > I didn't make any snapshots, nor did I set anything to have them made > automatically... so not sure where this snapshot came from or really > even if it is in fact a snapshot. > > Is it somehow a product of the resilvering? > > When I go to the root of this filesystem (/www) and run a find command > like: > find . -name 'VegasTraiiningTransitions.avi' > > The file is found. I haven't been able to test if they play yet but > wondering what this snapshot stuff means. And what I should do about > it. > > The warning clearly suggests they must be replaced with good copies. > > That wouldn't be too big a deal, but I do still have the other new > disk to insert and resilver. > > So what is the smart move here?... Replace the data before continuing > with the enlargement of the pool? Or something else? > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
