Hi Bob, On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:58:51 -0600 (CST) Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Tim wrote: > > > I don't think it hurts in the least to throw out some ideas. If > > they aren't valid, it's not hard to ignore them and move on. It > > surely isn't a waste of anyone's time to spend 5 minutes reading a > > response and weighing if the idea is valid or not. > > Today I sat down at 9:00 AM to read the new mail for the day and did > not catch up until five hours later. Quite a lot of the reading was > this (now) useless discussion thread. It is now useless since after > five hours of reading, there were no ideas expressed that had not > been expressed before. I've found this thread to be like watching a car accident, and also really frustrating due to the inability to use search engines on the part of many posters. > With this level of overhead, I am surprise that there is any > remaining development motion on ZFS at all. Good thing the ZFS developers have mail filters :-) cheers, James -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
