Could this be relevant? Notice sd_cache_control mismatch message. Thank
you everybody for any ideas or help. I really appreciate it.

Feb 06 2009 23:14:07.704531935 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.dev.uderr
nvlist version: 0
        class = ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.dev.uderr
        ena = 0x2487a4cf2e00c01
        detector = (embedded nvlist)
        nvlist version: 0
                version = 0x0
                scheme = dev
                device-path =
/p...@0,0/pci10de,3...@f/pci108e,2...@0/d...@1,0
                devid = id1,s...@tsun_____stk_raid_int____6db80b08
        (end detector)

        driver-assessment = fail
        op-code = 0x1a
        cdb = 0x1a 0x0 0x8 0x0 0x18 0x0
        pkt-reason = 0x0
        pkt-state = 0x1f
        pkt-stats = 0x0
        stat-code = 0x0
        un-decode-info = sd_cache_control: Mode Sense caching page code
mismatch 0
        un-decode-value =
        __ttl = 0x1
        __tod = 0x498d189f 0x29fe4ddf


Leonid

-----Original Message-----
From: cindy.swearin...@sun.com [mailto:cindy.swearin...@sun.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:42 PM
To: Roodnitsky, Leonid
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS corruption

Leonid,

You could use the fmdump -eV command to look for problems with these
disks. This command might generate a lot of output, but it should be
clear if the root cause is a problem accessing these devices.

I would also check /var/adm/messages for any driver-related messages.

Cindy

Leonid Roodnitsky wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Is there any way to figure out which piece is at fault? Sun SAS RAID
(Adaptec/Intel) controller is reporting that drives are good, but ZFS is
not happy about checksum errors. Is there any way to figure out which
component introduced the error?
> 
> Leonid
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to