On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Brad <bst...@aspirinsoftware.com> wrote: > Well if I do fsstat mountpoint on all the filesystems in the ZFS pool, then I > guess my aggregate number for read and write bandwidth should equal the > aggregate numbers for the pool? Yes? > > The downside is that fsstat has the same granularity issue as zpool iostat. > What I'd really like is nread and nwrite numbers instead of r/s w/s. That > way, if I miss some polls I can smooth out the results.
Just yank the raw kstats. This is a little harder than it seems. Unless you're in the case where you only have one pool, in which case: kstat unix:0:vopstats_zfs will give you the aggregate of all zfs filesystems straight off. The individual filesystem numbers come from kstats named like so: kstat unix:0:vopstats_4480002 and you have to match up the device id with the filesystem name from /etc/mnttab. In the case above, you need to match 4480002, which on my machine is the following line in /etc/mnttab: swap /tmp tmpfs xattr,dev=4480002 1232289278 so that's /tmp (not a zfs filesystem, but you should get the idea). -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
