On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, amy.r...@tufts.edu wrote: > mmusante> This is a known problem with ZFS and live upgrade. I believe the > mmusante> docs for s10u6 discourage the config you show here. A patch should > mmusante> be ready some time next month with a fix for this. > > Do you happen to have a bugid handy?
The closest one would be 6742586. The description of the bug doesn't exactly match what you saw, but the cause was the same: the zone mounting code in LU was broken and had to be rewritten. > I had done various searches to try and determine what the best way to > set up zones without any UFS was, and the closest I came was to setting > them up under the pool/ROOT/<BE> area. I tried giving them their own > dataset in pool (not under ROOT/<BE>), but that was also unsuccessful. There are some docs on s10u6's restrictions of where zones can be put if you are using live upgrade. I'll have to see if I can dig them up. > I guess let me back up and ask... If one only has one mirrored disk set > and one pool (the root pool), what's the recommended way to put zones on > a zfs root? Most of the documentation I've seen is specific to putting > the zone roots on UFS and giving them access to ZFS datasets. If you put your zones in a subdirectory of a dataset, they should work. But I'd recommend waiting for the patch to be released. Regards, markm _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
