Hi Gold, 9987988 sounds factual to me... IMHO, z
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Goldthorpe" <s...@waistcoat.org.uk> To: <zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 6:59 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6 > There's definately something strange going on as these are the only > uberblocks I can find by scanning /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 - nothing to conflict > with my theory so far: > > TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e29000 (14848000) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 106052 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:12 BLK: 0e69000 (15110144) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e29400 (14849024) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 106053 TIME: 2009-01-04:11:06:42 BLK: 0e69400 (15111168) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > skipped 248 blocks... > TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e1d800 (14800896) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 114710 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:14:10 BLK: 0e5d800 (15063040) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e1ec00 (14806016) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > TXG: 114715 TIME: 2009-01-07:11:15:41 BLK: 0e5ec00 (15068160) VER: 10 > GUID_SUM: 9f8d9ef301489223 (11497020190282519075) > > TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0023800 (145408) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1830158 TIME: 2008-11-20:08:46:41 BLK: 0063800 (407552) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 003b800 (243712) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1830382 TIME: 2008-11-20:09:05:20 BLK: 007b800 (505856) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > skipped 248 blocks... > TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0036800 (223232) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1832026 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:18 BLK: 0076800 (485376) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0036c00 (224256) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > TXG: 1832027 TIME: 2008-11-20:11:22:19 BLK: 0076c00 (486400) VER: 4 > GUID_SUM: 9ab0d28ccc7d2e94 (11146640579909987988) > > # zdb -l /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 0 > -------------------------------------------- > version=4 > name='zpool' > state=0 > txg=1809157 > pool_guid=17419375665629462002 > top_guid=12174008987990077602 > guid=12174008987990077602 > vdev_tree > type='disk' > id=0 > guid=12174008987990077602 > path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' > devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' > whole_disk=0 > metaslab_array=14 > metaslab_shift=30 > ashift=9 > asize=129904410624 > DTL=24 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 1 > -------------------------------------------- > version=4 > name='zpool' > state=0 > txg=1809157 > pool_guid=17419375665629462002 > top_guid=12174008987990077602 > guid=12174008987990077602 > vdev_tree > type='disk' > id=0 > guid=12174008987990077602 > path='/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7' > devid='id1,s...@n5000cca321ca2647/h' > whole_disk=0 > metaslab_array=14 > metaslab_shift=30 > ashift=9 > asize=129904410624 > DTL=24 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 2 > -------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 3 > -------------------------------------------- > > -Steve > >> After having a think I've come up with the following >> hypothesis: >> >> 1) When I was on Solaris 10u4 things were working >> fine. >> 2) When I re-installed with Solaris 10u6 and imported >> the zpool (with zpool import -f), it created a >> zpool.cache file and didn't update the on disk data >> structures for some reason. >> 3) When I re-installed Solaris 10u6, I lost the >> zpool.cache file and now zfs looks at the data >> structures on the disk and they are inconsistent. >> >> Could the above have actually happened? It would >> explain what I'm seeing. >> >> -Steve > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
