Tim Haley wrote: > Ross wrote: > >> While it's good that this is at least possible, that looks horribly >> complicated to me. >> Does anybody know if there's any work being done on making it easy to remove >> obsolete >> boot environments? >> > > If the clones were promoted at the time of their creation the BEs would > stay independent and individually deletable. Promotes can fail, though, > if there is not enough space. > > I was told a little while back when I ran into this myself on an Nevada > build where ludelete failed, that beadm *did* promote clones. This > thread appears to be evidence to the contrary. I think it's a bug, we > should either promote immediately on creation, or perhaps beadm destroy > could do the promotion behind the covers. > If I understand this right, the latter option looks better to me. Why consume the disk space before you have to? What does LU do?
-Kyle > -tim > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
