>In my experimentation (using my own buffer program), it's the receive 
>side buffering you need. The size of the buffer needs to be large enough 
>to hold 5 seconds worth of data. How much data/second you get will 
>depend on which part of your system is the limiting factor. In my case, 
>with 7200 RPM drives not striped and a 1Gbit network, the limiting 
>factor is the drives, which can easily deliver 50MBytes/sec, so a buffer 
>size of 250MBytes works well. With striped disks or 10,000 or 15,000 RPM 
>disks, the 1Gbit network might become the limiting factor (at around 
>100MByte/sec).

The modern "Green Caviars" from Western Digital run at 5400rpm; yet they
deliver 95MB/s from the outer tracks.

For ufs "ufsdump | ufsrestore" I have found that I prefer the buffer on the
receive side, but it should be much bigger.  ufsrestore starts with 
creating all directories and that is SLOW.

Casper

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to